Dating old shotgun houses
I recently acquired a hammer shotgun of uncertain age in bad repair because I thought I could learn more about antique shotguns by hands-on examination of a real one.Given its crudely replaced stock, the price of this one was so low that I didn’t think twice about the expense.
--W.marsh , 17 January 2006 (UTC)Raised houses have long been practical in New Orleans-- yes, flooding was a major concern (see Drainage in New Orleans for some historic background), though the parts of the city actually below sea level weren't developed until the 20th century, but between sub-tropical rainstorms and occasional river or lake flooding elevated architecture helped.it's hard to build five storey houses cheaply, even us ignorant Americans know that. Although a lot of shotgun houses were built to be rented out initially...If the article makes it sound like the shotgun house was the best Americans ever did at high density housing... The density was needed, but there more important reasons shotguns were built, i.e. I guess having a yard and a detached house was quite an appeal, even if you were renting it.If you merge them, preserve most of your information and structure, and add in whatever additional stuff there is at this title..206 , 5 September 2005 (UTC) I have changed the comments on land usage.Do you mean to say the houses do or do not have cellars?If they do, the phrasing should probably be something like "with a cellar behind in lieu of a basement." , 17 January 2006 (UTC) The ones I've encountered have cellars, but I've having a hard time tracking down an actual source for that.--W.marsh , 9 August 2006 (UTC) "A sign of its New Orleans heritage, the house is usually raised 2 to 3 feet off the ground, although basements were not built, in lieu of a cellar behind the house." This sentence needs clarification., 12 January 2006 (UTC) I suppose someone can explain this better than me, but obviously most of New Orleans (particularly the less affluent areas where shotguns would be built) is below sea level...Tentatively, therefore, it appears that the gun was proofed in Birmingham sometime after 1868 on the early side (given the Purdey opener and rebounding locks) but before 1875 (given the lack of choke boring and the absence of the “NOT FOR BALL” warning that began in 1875). Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.